In November, OpenAI launched the Sora Android app globally, giving anyone with an Android device the ability to transform a short text prompt into a vivid, high-quality video. On launch day, the app reached the #1 position on Google Play, with Android users generating more than one million videos in the first 24 hours.
Behind this rapid release lies a deeper engineering story. The initial production version of Sora for Android was built in just 28 days using openai codex, the same AI coding agent publicly available to developers and teams worldwide.
Between October 8 and November 5, 2025, a lean engineering group worked alongside Codex, consuming roughly five billion tokens to take Sora from an internal prototype to a global Android launch. Despite the compressed timeline and massive scale, the app achieved a 99.9% crash-free rate at launch and shipped with a production-grade architecture designed for long-term maintainability.
Contrary to speculation, no private or undisclosed AI model was used. The team relied on an early version of the GPT-5.1-Codex model — the same version accessible today through CLI tools, IDE extensions, and web applications.
Embracing Brooks’ Law: Why Fewer Engineers Moved Faster
When Sora launched on iOS, user adoption surged immediately. Video generation activity spiked, validating demand. On Android, however, the situation was different: only a small internal prototype existed, while pre-registrations on Google Play continued to climb.
In high-pressure product launches, organizations often respond by adding engineers and introducing more process. Historically, an Android application of this complexity and reliability would involve large teams working for several months — often slowed by coordination costs and integration overhead.
This is where OpenAI leaned on a decades-old insight. Computer scientist Fred Brooks famously warned that adding more people to a late software project makes it later. Instead of ignoring Brooks’ Law, OpenAI applied it directly.
Rather than expanding headcount, the company assembled a focused team of four senior engineers, each augmented by openai codex. This setup dramatically increased individual leverage while minimizing communication friction.
Working under this model, the team shipped an internal Android build to employees in just 18 days, followed by a public launch 10 days later. Throughout the sprint, the engineers maintained rigorous Android development standards, invested in code maintainability, and enforced the same reliability thresholds expected from much longer traditional projects. Codex continues to be used extensively to evolve and expand the app today.
Onboarding OpenAI Codex Like a Senior Engineer
Understanding how Codex was integrated into the workflow requires understanding how the team framed its role. Codex was treated not as a passive code generator, but as a newly hired senior engineer.
This framing shifted effort away from manual typing and toward direction, review, and architectural oversight. Engineers spent more time guiding Codex and validating output than writing code line by line.
Where OpenAI Codex Required Explicit Guidance
Despite its strengths, openai codex had clear limitations:
- It could not infer unstated preferences, such as architectural conventions, product strategy, or internal shortcuts.
- It had no experiential awareness. Codex could not run the app on a physical device, sense awkward scrolling, or detect confusing user flows.
- Each Codex session required onboarding. Clear goals, constraints, and explanations of “how things are done” were critical.
- Codex struggled with deep architectural judgment. Left alone, it might introduce unnecessary view models or misplace logic in the UI layer rather than repositories.
- Its default objective was functional completion, not long-term cleanliness.
To address this, OpenAI relied heavily on persistent AGENTS.md files distributed throughout the codebase. These documents encoded architectural patterns, style guidelines, and expectations, ensuring consistency across Codex sessions.
Where OpenAI Codex Excelled
Once properly guided, openai codex consistently delivered high-leverage contributions:
Rapid Comprehension of Large Codebases
Codex quickly understood extensive Android, backend, and iOS repositories. Its familiarity with major programming languages allowed concepts to transfer cleanly across platforms.
Broad Test Coverage
Codex showed an unusual enthusiasm for writing unit tests. While not every test was deeply complex, the breadth of coverage helped prevent regressions during rapid iteration.
Feedback Responsiveness
When CI pipelines failed, engineers pasted logs directly into Codex prompts and requested fixes, accelerating debugging cycles.
Parallel, Disposable Execution
Multiple Codex sessions could operate simultaneously. Engineers explored alternative implementations in parallel, treating code as disposable until validated.
Generative Perspective
During design discussions, Codex surfaced potential failure points and proposed optimizations. Notably, while optimizing video playback memory usage, Codex analyzed multiple SDKs and suggested approaches that minimized memory footprint — insights the team might not have had time to uncover manually.
Higher-Leverage Human Work
As Codex handled the bulk of implementation, engineers focused on architecture, systemic improvements, and code review. Codex also contributed meaningfully during review by flagging bugs and improving reliability before merges.
Laying the Architectural Foundation by Hand
Even the strongest senior hire lacks the context to make long-term trade-offs immediately. OpenAI’s engineers intentionally retained ownership of core system design.
Human-led decisions included:
- Overall architecture and modularization
- Dependency injection strategy
- Navigation structure
- Authentication and base networking flows
From this foundation, the team implemented several representative features end-to-end, documenting patterns as they went. These examples served as concrete references for Codex.
An estimated 85% of the final codebase was written by Codex, but this was only possible because the foundation was carefully planned. This decision eliminated costly refactoring and proved to be one of the most important choices of the entire project.
Why “Build It All at Once” Failed
The team briefly experimented with a single prompt: “Build the Sora Android app based on the iOS code.” While Codex produced functional output, the resulting experience was subpar and unreliable.
Without deep understanding of endpoints, data flows, and user journeys, large one-shot code generation proved risky. Thousands of lines of code merged without structure increased long-term risk rather than reducing effort.
Instead, Codex performed best when operating inside a sandbox of strong examples. Requests framed as “build this screen using the same architecture as this existing screen” produced dramatically better results.
Humans defined structure and invariants. Codex filled in execution.
Planning With OpenAI Codex Before Coding
To enable Codex to work for extended periods — sometimes exceeding 24 hours — the team refined its workflow.
For non-trivial changes:
- Codex first analyzed related files and summarized how features worked.
- Engineers corrected misunderstandings.
- Codex proposed an implementation plan.
- Only then did coding begin, step by step.
For long tasks exceeding context limits, plans were saved to files and reused across sessions. This planning loop made extended unsupervised execution possible and simplified code review by anchoring changes to a shared roadmap.
Distributed Engineering With Parallel Codex Sessions
At peak velocity, multiple Codex sessions ran simultaneously — one handling playback, another search, another error handling, and others managing tests or refactors.
Progress updates flowed back regularly, requiring feedback, review, and integration. The dynamic resembled managing a distributed engineering team more than using a traditional tool.
The development bottleneck shifted. Writing code was no longer the constraint; decision-making, feedback, and integration were.
Brooks’ Law resurfaced in a new form: adding more Codex sessions still introduced coordination overhead. Productivity gains were real, but not infinite.
OpenAI Codex as a Cross-Platform Force Multiplier
Because Sora already existed on iOS, Codex frequently referenced Swift implementations to generate equivalent Kotlin code for Android. Application logic proved portable, even when languages differed.
Rather than relying on shared abstractions like React Native or Flutter, OpenAI effectively used openai codex as a translation engine — preserving semantics while avoiding duplicated effort.
Codex performed best when it had concrete examples from iOS and a clear understanding of Android architecture. Lacking context, it guessed. With context, it excelled.
The Future of Software Engineering, in Practice
By the end of the four-week sprint, Codex stopped feeling experimental. It became the default development loop.
The experience reinforced a critical truth: AI-assisted development does not reduce the need for rigor — it increases it. Codex optimizes execution speed, but humans remain essential for system design, trade-offs, and long-term thinking.
The future software engineer’s superpower will not be typing speed, but deep systems understanding and the ability to collaborate with AI agents over long time horizons.
Final Perspective
The Sora Android launch demonstrates what becomes possible when openai codex operates inside a context-rich, human-defined framework.
Codex did not replace engineers.
It amplified them.
For teams willing to rethink how software is built, this case offers a clear glimpse into the next era of engineering.
Explore more AI insights, case studies, and strategic analysis on how artificial intelligence is transforming business and technology across the US market in our AI section at Plus Reference.
